 |
Digital camera reviews of Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR CamerasDigital camera Review: CJB-AZ Summary: 4 Stars
Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR CamerasI am a photo enthusiast and I have really been enjoying this new lens. I've been taking a lot of photos of birds in and around where I live and so for it has lived up to all my expectations.
And I don't mind the manual focus at all, I'm used to the manual lenses, as that is what I had on my old Canon AE1 camera. I get good sharp pictures, even when I use the 1.4 extender and tripod of course.
I would recommend this lens to friends, and anyone who would ask about it.
Digital camera Review: Can't beat it for the price!! Summary: 5 Stars
This 15 foot USB 2.0 A/B cable is a real bargain. Shipped right away and works just fine with my Line 6 hardware. Less than $5 for the product AND the shipping!! Radio Shack sells a similar item for $40+. Need I say more?
Digital camera Review: Cannon 400mm lens Summary: 5 Stars
Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras I love this lens. The images are so clear and it is great to get close-up photos.
Digital camera Review: Cannons 100-400 f4.5 5.6L IS USM Summary: 5 Stars
My first L Zoom Lens used it three times and finally everything fell in place about this lens and focusing. Takes sharp,crsp,beautiful pictures they are right on more than I could have hoped or asked for in this lens.
Digital camera Review: Canon 100-400 review Summary: 3 Stars
After reading all the reviews online I decided to take the plunge and try out this lens. I had just rented the Canon 400mm f/5.6 prime lens, but wanted the flexiblility of a zoom and IS. I found the push pull design not to be a problem at all as is mentioned in forums often. This is a heavy lens, and found my arms getting a little tired after couple hours. The image quality was ok, at 400mm is certianly was not up to the 400 prime lens I had rented. The build date showed this lens to be a 2010 mfg. date, as often mentioned there are good and bad versions. After a short time I decided to return the lens due to the softness at 400mm. I'm sure with time I would have gotten better shots. I give this 3 stars because pictures were good, not great, it was easy to use for short time frames, handheld anyway. Interesting is that on my kit lens and another lens I have purchased crop pictures were much sharper than compared to crops of pictures using this lens, and was big part in my decision to return this lens.
More Customer Reviews: First Review 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
|
 |
|
|
|