Casio HR-100TM 2-Color Printing Calculator by Casio
|
List Price: Our Price: $16.47 You Save: $7.52 (31%) Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Buy Used: from $12.99 (click here) Category: CE See more digital camera details and other models |
|---|
Digital camera reviews of Casio HR-100TM 2-Color Printing Calculator
Digital camera Review: Calculator
Summary: 5 Stars
Just what I was looking for. Easy to use, the right size. Highly recommended.Digital camera Review: Calculator
Summary: 4 Stars
this calculator was sent to me by mistake according to the company. I actually ordered a small calculator. They told me to keep the more expensive one for the same amount I paid for the small one. It is a nice calculator but was larger than I really wanted. The only problem I had was figuring out how to fit the roll of paper on it.Digital camera Review: Casio HR Printing Calculator
Summary: 3 Stars
Easy right out of the box. However, instructions for use miss steps and are complicated. Machine is light weight with nice size keys. Wish that it came along with a roll of tape. Good value for the cost.Digital camera Review: Casio HR-100TM
Summary: 5 Stars
This unit replaced an old Casio HR-100 that finally gave up after 10 years. I couldn't beat the newer version (this one) for the price and features, and if it lasts as long as the other one did, I'll be more than pleased. The display on this one is large and easy to read. The only problem I had in setup was seating the ink rollers for the tape. After I finally got it snapped in correctly, the unit works flawlessly.Digital camera Review: Casio battery operated calculator
Summary: 5 Stars
I thought I was ordering a Canon Brand printing calculator,however this one is just fine although the buttons are in a different location it is easy to use for simple checkbook balancing. Ordering on amazon is so easy now that they have my billing info as well as credit card info. I trust them so I don't mind them keeping my info on file.Not so much other internet sellers.I hope my trust is not misplaced.JohnO.Texas