Nikon D700 12.1MP FX-Format CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD (Body Only) by Nikon
|
Our Price: $2,899.00 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Buy Used: from $1,420.00 (click here) Category: Digital Camera See more digital camera details and other models |
|---|
Digital camera reviews of Nikon D700 12.1MP FX-Format CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD (Body Only)
Digital camera Review: Better than I expected
Summary: 5 Stars
I already owned a D 300, and was very happy with it, but I knew I would not be happy until I got a full-frame. The big advantage to having both is that I can go from extremelty wide angle to extreme telephoto with the same set of lenses.
I expected the D700 to be better than the D300, but not much better. However, when I started to shoot with it, I was blown away with the difference. In fact, I haven't picked up the D300 since getting it. Actually, even with the further telephoto reach I can get with the D300, I think I'm better off shooting with the D700 and cropping more.
I shoot consistently at 3200, and what I get isn't just acceptable, it's just fine. In fact, 6400 or even higher will surprise you, no matter what you're expecting. I can't believe what I could do hand holding with only a single candle as a light source. This camera changes the way you think about flash forever.
Now, I have to wonder about the 24 mp D3X. Would it blow me away just as much? Maybe the ideal pair of cameras aren't the D300 and the D700, but rather the D700 (for low light) and the D3X (for unbelievable resolution). Or,maybe all three bodies are even better. . .
Digital camera Review: Brilliant
Summary: 5 Stars
Upgraded from a D80 about a year ago. The learning curve was surprisingly low as I was able to jump right in pretty quickly and set up the D700 to my liking.
I never do a very in-depth review, but if you're looking for a great camera (pro quality), the D700 should definitely be on your list of possibles.
Great quality in low light. 9 FPS. Great tonal range in my images.
The only cons I can think of are the size and weight. Especially if you incorporate the grip and a pro-grade lens. With my 24-70 it's one beast of a kit.
Digital camera Review: Caveat Emptor
Summary: 1 Stars
OK, Amazon asked me (by email) to review this camera so I'm going to bite. First of all, I must say that I am a long-time Nikon user. I currently own two film bodies(N90S and F100) and one DSLR (D200). I've used primarily the D200 for the past 3 years. Before that, I collected a lot of "film" Nikkors as well as my film bodies, so that was one reason I wanted to go FX. So I'm not a troll or have any axe to grind with Nikon. Generally their products have performed very well for me and when (rarely) I have needed their customer service, it has been good. I love the F100 and if I had time, I think I would still shoot film with it. But this review is about the D700 and unfortunately, the D700 is on its way back to Amazon for a refund. There was a really bad spot on the sensor (many pixels were affected) that was visible on any image shot at ISO 400 or above. This "red spot" was even visible on jpegs on the normal size that opened with NX2 - no magnification. The main reason I am writing this review is to let prospective buyers know you should thoroughly check out your new camera ASAP after receiving it. Thanks Amazon for you great return policy! This was a BIG investment for me. I have seen images from the D700 and they are really gorgeous but now I wonder how good Nikon's QA/QC is. I'm undecided if I'm going to try another sample as this has created work and anxiety that I don't need. I may stick with my D200 for awhile, as it still works great an produces nice images. I have no idea what the probability of getting a defective Nikon may be, but I sure would like to know the odds. I'm pretty sure that if I would not have been able to return the camera that Nikon would have made some sort of fix under warranty, but that would have been even more hassle and anxiety. Hence the title of this review. Good luck and I hope you get a good sample. I'm sure this would have been five stars if I had gotten a D700 with a good sensor.Digital camera Review: Comments of newly purchased Nikon D700
Summary: 5 Stars
The camera has exceeded my expectations, due to work requirements I have not been able to use it as much as I want to. Also expected to take a trip, but that has been put on hold due to a medical issue. Anticipate being able to use the camera like I expected to shortly after 1 Jan 09. So far I love the camera.Digital camera Review: Considering the D700 or the D300s or even the D90
Summary: 5 Stars
I'd first like to say that I'm not an elaborate product reviewer. This is not all about technical specs and all that. I wanted to review the Nikon D700 because I feel it's worth it.
My experience with Nikon has been the D70 and D90, both of which are fine camera's. I still have the D90 and wanted to make the move to FX and a "pro" body as my primary camera. I was on the fence as to whether I really needed the FX sensor so my basic decision was between the D700 and the D300s. I've read many reviews on both the D700 and earlier model D300 and know both are great camera's to own and use. My concern was if the additional cost of the D700 and it's specific features were enough to make the choice between it and the D300s.
To make a quick statement. If you're considering getting the D90, stop and take a look at the D300s. The build and control layout is almost identical between the D700 and D300s for me to now know that the D300s is well worth the extra over the D90. Just keep it in mind if you happen to be reading this review and are considering either the D90 or D300s.
I'm impressed at how the D700 feels in your hand. Coming from a D70 to the D90 in a way, in the feel department was a step back. The D70 had a more solid feel than the D90. Now going from the D90 to the D700, WOW!! What a huge difference. The weight, solid feel, control feel, all are top notch on the D700 (and assuming the D300s as well). Take for instance the control wheels. On the D90 they are made of hard plastic. On the D700, they may still be hard plastic but they have a rubber coating/feel to them which feels more solid.
Pair the D700 with the MB-D10 and you have a winning combo!. You can take a look at the "after market" battery grips but I'm telling you, the official Nikon MB-D10 is solid. I have the MB-D80 on the D90 and it's all plastic. The MB-D10 is a core of metal, and you can feel the difference. I know the MB-D10 is more expensive but this is a prime example of "you get what you pay for...".
So in conclusion, if you want a solid camera body, consider either the D700 or the D300s. If you're on the fence between the D90 and the D300s, go for the D300s. It's worth the extra cash. If you can't decide between the D700 and the D300s, then consider the need for the FX sensor with it's low light capabilities. I know the D700 is a wonderful camera as I'm sure the D300s is as well.